000			04300cam a2200625 i 4500
001			on1230952098
003			OCoLC
005			20230914093654.0
008			201208t20212021mdu b 001 0 eng c
040			_aUKMGB _beng _erda _cUKMGB _dOCLCO _dOCLCF _dBOP _dYDX _dBDX _dGWL _dOCLCO _dCOO _dFWA _dOCLCO
015			_aGBC0J7714 _2bnb
016	7		_a020041728 _2Uk
019			_a1193125262
020			_a9781793626349 _qhardcover
020			_a1793626340 _qhardcover
020			_a9781793626363 _q(paperback)
020			_a1793626367 _q(paperback)
020			_z9781793626356 _qelectronic publication
029	0		_aUKMGB _b020041728
035			_a(OCoLC)1230952098 _z(OCoLC)1193125262
043			_an-us---
050		4	_aKF4765 _b.L86 2021
082	0	4	_a347.73/5 _223
049			_aTZAA
100	1		_aLunder, Matthew W., _eauthor.
245	1	4	_aThe concept of ordered liberty and the common-law due-process tradition : _bslaughterhouse cases through Obergefell v. Hodges (1872-2015) / _cMatthew W. Lunder.
264		1	_aLanham ; _aBoulder ; _aNew York ; _aLondon : _bLexington Books, _c[2021]
264		4	_c�2021
300			_axv, 267 pages ; _c24 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aA Bulwark against Arbitrary Legislation -- Liberty and Economic Ideology -- Philosophy, Incorporation, and Natural Law -- A Reasonable and Sensitive Judgment -- A Zone of Substantive Rights -- Procedural and Substantive Due Process -- Deeply Rooted in History and Tradition -- A Different Description of Fundamental Liberties -- The Inquiry Thus Reduces -- The Dimension of Personal Liberty -- The Guideposts of History, Tradition, and Practice -- The Tradition Is a Living Thing -- Certain Actions Are Prohibited -- A Prudential Exercise of the Judicial Power -- What Freedom Must Become.
520			_a"[This book] is a story of due process from the common-law tradition. Told through Supreme Court cases against a backdrop of political theory, legal philosophy and history, it illuminates a mid-twentieth-century dialectic between theories--liberal and conservative--for resolving controversies about state interference with personal liberties. So pervasive was the partisanship flowing from a riven body politic that every institution comprising the fabric of American society, including the federal courts, was soaked in it. But the ideological contest is not the story's primary concern. More pertinent to our dilemma today is what the clash of ideologies eclipsed: a venerable judicial practice deeply rooted in American history and tradition. The moral of the story is in this praxis at its center and its understanding of the limits of legislative and judicial power. The modern liberal and conservative approaches to fundamental rights fall short of the tradition, having strayed from the common-law concept of ordered liberty. Readers will find a suprapartisan perspective on the federal courts' obligation to resolve disputes about our Nation's most controversial issues, and a critical reflection on the modern Supreme Court's role in its politics"--Back cover.
650		0	_aDue process of law _zUnited States.
650		0	_aCommon law _zUnited States _vCases.
650		0	_aLiberty.
610	1	0	_aUnited States. _bSupreme Court.
650		6	_aApplication r�eguli�ere de la loi _0(CaQQLa)201-0007487 _z�Etats-Unis. _0(CaQQLa)201-0407727
650		6	_aCommon law _0(CaQQLa)201-0022783 _z�Etats-Unis _0(CaQQLa)201-0407727 _vJurisprudence. _0(CaQQLa)201-0378129
650		6	_aLibert�e. _0(CaQQLa)201-0022755
610	1	6	_a�Etats-Unis. _bSupreme Court.
650		7	_afreedom. _2aat _0(CStmoGRI)aat300055497
610	1	7	_aUnited States. _bSupreme Court. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00529481
650		7	_aCommon law. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00869795
650		7	_aDue process of law. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00899343
650		7	_aLiberty. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00997251
651		7	_aUnited States. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01204155
655		7	_aTrials, litigation, etc. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01423712
776	0	8	_iebook version : _z9781793626356
938			_aBrodart _bBROD _n127719431
938			_aYBP Library Services _bYANK _n16933698
994			_aC0 _bTZACH
999			_c7155 _d7155