000			05599cam a2200445Mi 4500
001			on1145998976
003			TZ-ArACH
005			20230911095033.0
006			m d
007			t| ||||||||||||||||||||
008			200227s2015 enk o 001 0 eng d
020			_a9781316603482 _q(paperback)
020			_a1316603482
035			_a(OCoLC)1145998976
040			_aT9K _beng _erda _cTZ-ArACH
049			_aTZAA
050	0	0	_aKZ6250 _b.S25 2015
100	1		_aSalles, Luiz Eduardo Ribeiro, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aForum shopping in international adjudication : _bthe role of preliminary objections / _cLuiz Eduardo Salles.
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2015.
300			_a1 online resource (xii, 320 pages).
490	1		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v105
500			_aTABLE OF CONTENTS:
505	0	0	_tIntroduction, p.1 -- _tThe research question and this book's perspective, p.1 -- _tThe importance of the framework suggested in this book, p.7 -- _tThe thrust of the argument, p.11 -- _tThe structure of this book, p.12 -- _g1 _tThe rise of forum shopping, p.16 -- _g1.1 _tIntroduction, p.16 -- _g1.2 _tThe transformation of international adjudication, p.17 -- _g1.3 _tPotential concerns arising from forum shopping, p.30 -- _g1.4 _tConcluding remarks, p.46 -- _g2 _tForum shopping and procedure, p.47 -- _g2.1 _tIntroduction, p.47 -- _g2.2 _tProcedure, p.48 -- _g2.3 _tProcedure in the context of forum shopping: a new, emerging role for preliminary objections, p.54 -- _g2.4 _tSome limitations of the present approach, p.65 -- _g2.5 _tConcluding remarks, p.75 -- _g3 _tPreliminary questions and preliminary objections, p.76 -- _g3.1 _tIntroduction, p.76 -- _g3.2 _tThe concept of preliminary questions and objections in international adjudication, p.77 -- _g3.3 _tProcedure versus substance, back again, p.90 -- _g3.4 _tPreliminary questions and facts entangled with the merits: practical alternatives, p.97 -- _g3.5 _tConcluding remarks, p.110 -- _g4 _tThe source and contours of international tribunals' authority to rule on preliminary questions, p.112 -- _g4.1 _tIntroduction, p.112 -- _g4.2 _tAdjudicatory jurisdiction, principal jurisdiction, incidental jurisdiction, and the inherent power to rule on preliminary objections, p.114 -- _g4.3 _tThe scope of the applicable law of preliminary objections, p.123 -- _g4.4 _tThe stabilizing effect of a decision on a preliminary question, p.135 -- _g4.5 _tConcluding remarks, p.140 -- _g5 _tJurisdiction and admissibility, p.141 -- _g5.1 _tIntroduction, p.141 -- _g5.2 _tA distinction that makes a difference, p.142 -- _g5.3 _tThree typical approaches to jurisdiction versus admissibility, p.160 -- _g5.4 _tAddressing forum shopping strategies through preliminary questions: jurisdiction or admissibility?, p.173 - _g5.5 _tConcluding remarks, p.178 -- _g6 _tInternational tribunals' discretion to (not) exhaust principal jurisdiction and forum shopping, p.180 -- _g6.1 _tIntroduction, p.180 -- _g6.2 _tDiscretion and its dimensions, p.182 -- _g6.3 _tDiscretion to dismiss, p.186 -- _g6.4 _tDiscretion to stay: a window of opportunity, p.205 -- _g6.5 _tAbstention doctrines in international adjudication: a potential way forward?, p.217 -- _g6.6 _tConcluding remarks, p.225 -- _g7 _tPrinciples and rules pennitting procedural coordination through the prism of preliminary objections, p.227 -- _g7.1 _tIntroduction, p.227 -- _g7.2 _tExclusive jurisdiction clauses, p.228 -- _g7.3 _tFork-in-the-road clauses, p.245 -- _g7.4 _tSubsidiary jurisdiction clauses, p.260 -- _g7.5 _tPreferential jurisdiction clauses, p.265 -- _g7.6 _tThe proteetion of res judicata and collateral estoppel, p.267 -- _g7.7 _tA protection of lis pendens?, p.277 -- _g7.8 _tAggregation doctrines, p.281 -- _g7.9 _tConcluding remarks, p.287 -- _tConclusion, p.290 -- _tA procedural tack on forum shopping, p.290 -- _tA summary of the book, p.290 -- _tForum shoppers, preliminary objcetors, and the case-by-case management of jurisdictional overlaps, p.295
520			_aForum shopping, which consists of strategic forum selection, parallel litigation and serial litigation, is a phenomenon of growing importance in international adjudication. Preliminary objections (or a party's placement of conditions on the existence and development of the adjudicatory process) have been traditionally conceived as barriers to adjudication before single forums. This book discusses how adjudicators and parties may refer to questions of jurisdiction and admissibility in order to avoid conflicting decisions on overlapping cases, excessive exercises of jurisdiction and the proliferation of litigation. It highlights an emerging, overlooked function of preliminary objections: transmission belts of procedure-regulating rules across the 'international judiciary'. Activating this often dormant, managerial function of preliminary objections would nurture coordination of otherwise independent and autonomous tribunals.
650		0	_aInternational courts.
650		0	_aCommercial courts.
650		0	_aForum shopping.
650		0	_aJurisdiction (International law)
650		6	_aTribunaux internationaux.
650		6	_aTribunaux de commerce.
650		6	_aJuridiction (Droit international)
650		7	_aCommercial courts. _2fast
650		7	_aForum shopping. _2fast
650		7	_aInternational courts. _2fast
650		7	_aJurisdiction (International law) _2fast
830		0	_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ; _v105. _9706
856	4	2	_uhttp://media.library.ku.edu.tr/BookCoverImages/forum_shopping_in.jpg _zcover image
942			_2lcc _cBOOK
999			_c7016 _d7016