000			03308cam a2200457 i 4500
001			on1159883826
003			OCoLC
005			20220325133313.0
008			200605t20202020enka b 001 0 eng c
010			_a 2020931643
015			_aGBC085340 _2bnb
016	7		_a019842221 _2Uk
020			_a9780198822103 _qhardcover
020			_a0198822103 _qhardcover
029	1		_aUKMGB _b019842221
029	1		_aAU@ _b000068150296
035			_a(OCoLC)1159883826
040			_aERASA _beng _erda _cERASA _dBDX _dUKMGB _dOCLCF _dOCLCO _dCDX _dYDXIT _dGUL _dEMI _dDLC _dBDF
042			_apcc
043			_ae-uk---
049			_aTZAA
050		4	_aKD4645 _b.M39 2020
082	0	4	_a347.41/012 _223
100	1		_aMcConville, Michael, _eauthor.
245	1	4	_aThe myth of judicial independence : _bcriminal justice and the separation of powers / _cMike McConville, Luke Marsh.
250			_aFirst edition.
300			_axiv, 318 pages : _billustrations ; _c24 cm
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 277-299) and indexes.
505	0		_aIntroduction and overview -- The management of criminal justice : an early challenge -- The origin of the judges' rule -- The aftermath : 1918-60 -- The first draft : the judges and the Home Office -- The war of attrition and the vanquishing of the judges -- The legacy of the 1964 rules -- Rule of law and common law -- Constitutionalism and the Westminster model -- The politics of the judiciary -- The global diaspora -- Appraisal and review.
520	8		_aThrough an examination of the history of the rules that regulate police interrogation (the Judges' Rules) in conjunction with plea bargaining and the Criminal Procedure Rules, this book explores the 'Westminster Model' under which three arms of the State (parliament, the executive, and the judiciary) operate independently of one another. It reveals how policy was framed in secret meetings with the executive which then actively misled parliament in contradiction to its ostensible formal relationship with the legislature. This analysis of Home Office archives shows how the worldwide significance of the Judges' Rules was secured not simply by the standing of the English judiciary and the political power of the empire but more significantly by the false representation that the Rules were the handiwork of judges rather than civil servants and politicians. The book critically examines the claim repeatedly advanced by judges that "judicial independence" is justified by principles arising from the "rule of law" and instead shows that the "rule of law" depends upon basic principles of the common law, including an adversarial process and trial by jury, and that the underpinnings of judicial action in criminal justice today may be ideological rather than based on principles.
650		0	_aJudicial independence _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aPolice questioning _xLaw and legislation _zGreat Britain _vCase studies.
650		7	_aJudicial independence. _2fast
650		7	_aInd�ependance judiciaire _zGrande-Bretagne. _2ram
650		7	_aJustice p�enale _xAdministration _zGrande-Bretagne. _2ram
650		7	_aInterrogatoire policier _zGrande-Bretagne. _2ram
651		7	_aGreat Britain. _2fast
655		7	_aCase studies. _2fast
700	1		_aMarsh, Luke, _eauthor.
942			_2lcc _cBOOK
999			_c6618 _d6618