000			03899cam a2200517 i 4500
001			ocn944160601
003			TZ-ArACH
005			20220321111936.0
008			170306t20162016enk b 000 0 eng c
010			_a 2016478405
015			_aGBB6C9182 _2bnb
016	7		_a017893553 _2Uk
020			_a9781780683867 _q(hbk.)
020			_a1780683863 _q(hbk.)
035			_a(OCoLC)944160601
040			_aERASA _beng _erda _cTZ-ArACH
042			_apcc
049			_aTZAA
050	0	0	_aKZ1266 _b.V36 2016
100	1		_aVandenbogaerde, Arne, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aTowards shared accountability in international human rights law : _blaw, procedures and principles / _cArne Vandenbogaerde.
260			_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; _aAntwerp ; _a Portland : _bIntersentia, _c2016.
300			_axvii, 349 pages ; _c25 cm.
490	1		_aLaw and cosmopolitan values ; _v7
500			_aBased on the author's Ph. D. thesis--University of Antwerp, 2015 --Acknowledgment.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 319-349).
505	0		_aIntroduction -- The Concept of Accountability -- State Reporting Procedures at the International and Regional Level -- Individual, Collective and Inter-State Complaint Procedures in the International and Regional Accountability Framework -- Inquiry Procedures in the International and Regional Accountability Framework -- International Peer-Review Accountability Mechanisms -- Special Procedures in the International and Regional Systems -- Admissibility Criteria in a Multi-Duty Bearer Framework -- Attributing Obligations in a Multi-Duty Bearer Framework.
520	8		_a"Non-State actors, principally corporations and international organizations, as well as foreign States, influence decision-making. This reality particularly affects the enjoyment and implementation of economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights. Alongside what has become a fast-moving reality, legal developments in the field of ESC rights are also happening at a fast pace. In the last decade we have not only witnessed the end of the ESC justiciability debate, including a growing recognition of these rights at the domestic level, but also the adoption of an international complaints procedure to deal with violations of ESC rights (OP-ICESCR). Yet, these legal developments fall short of providing accountability in a globalized world. There is a discrepancy between international human rights law - with its focus on the territorial State - and the current globalized context in which non-state actors and foreign States also affect the enjoyment of ESC rights. Scholars have argued for the expansion of the duty-bearer side of human rights law in order 'to synch' human rights law with reality. Most of the research in the last decade has focused on the recognition of the obligations of foreign States and NSAs, less so on subsequent rules for the attribution and distribution of obligations, responsibility, and remedies. What are the (legal) building blocks or foundations of a multi-duty-bearer accountability framework?"--Back cover.
650		0	_aInternational law and human rights.
650		0	_aNon-state actors (International relations)
650		0	_aHuman rights and globalization. _913403
650		0	_aLiability for human rights violations.
650		7	_a86.81 human rights. _2bcl
650		7	_aDroits de l'homme. _2eclas
650		7	_aDroit d'ingerence. _2eclas
650		7	_aOrganisation des Nations unies. _2eclas
650		7	_aApplication des lois. _2eclas
650		7	_aTheses. _2eclas
650		7	_aHuman rights and globalization. _2fast _913403
650		7	_aInternational law and human rights. _2fast
650		7	_aLiability for human rights violations. _2fast
650		7	_aNon-state actors (International relations) _2fast
650		7	_aHuman rights. _2nbc
830		0	_aLaw and cosmopolitan values ; _v7.
942			_2lcc _cBOOK
999			_c6516 _d6516