000 03598cam a2200481 i 4500
001 on1099540248
003 OCoLC
005 20210914125802.0
008 190423t20192019enka b 001 0 eng
010 _a 2019019447
015 _aGBB9D3903
_2bnb
016 7 _a019494714
_2Uk
020 _a9781108485852
_qhardcover
020 _a1108485855
_qhardcover
020 _a9781108725286
_qpaperback
020 _a1108725287
029 1 _aUKMGB
_b019494714
035 _a(OCoLC)1099540248
040 _aDLC
_beng
_erda
_cDLC
042 _apcc
049 _aTZAA
050 0 0 _aKZ6115
_b.L44 2019
245 0 0 _aLegitimacy of unseen actors in international adjudication /
_cedited by Freya Baetens.
260 _aCambridge, United Kingdom ;
_aNew York, NY :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2019.
300 _axxiii, 626 pages :
_billustrations ;
_c24 cm.
490 1 _aStudies on international courts and tribunals
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 _aInstitutional perspectives -- Nomination and appointment -- Case management and deference to the bench -- Confidentiality and transparency -- Ethics and accountability -- External influences and activities
520 _a"'Unseen actors' are vital to the functioning of international courts and tribunals, exercising varying levels of influence on the adjudicatory process and its outcome. The last few decades have witnessed an expansion in the number of international judicial bodies. Although these bodies differ in their institutional make-up and functions, a characteristic shared among them is their reliance on the contribution of individuals or entities other than the judicial decision-makers themselves. Unseen actors may take the form of registries, secretariats, law clerks and legal officers, but they also include non-lawyers such as translators, members of the medical profession and scientific experts. Some of these actors may be 'more unseen' than others but most remain nameless in the written decisions, and the extent of their contribution is generally unclear. The opaqueness of their role, combined with the significance of the judicial decision for the parties involved as well as for a wider range of stakeholders, raises questions about the impact of these unseen actors on the legitimacy of international adjudication as such. For example, an unseen actor's influence has formed a ground upon which an arbitral award was challenged, as substantial parts had allegedly been written by a legal assistant rather than the arbitrators themselves. The domestic court adjudicating the dispute in first instance set aside the award on a different ground, so it did not address this point; the case is currently pending on appeal. This book aims to answer such legitimacy questions and identify 'best practices', where feasible, through a multifaceted enquiry into possible common connections and patterns in the institutional makeup and daily practice of international courts and tribunals"--
650 0 _aArbitration (International law)
650 0 _aJurisdiction (International law)
650 0 _aInternational courts.
650 7 _aLaw / International.
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aArbitration (International law)
_2fast
650 7 _aInternational courts.
_2fast
650 7 _aJurisdiction (International law)
_2fast
650 7 _aInternational courts.
_2pplt
650 7 _aInternational arbitration.
_2pplt
650 7 _aLegitimacy.
_2pplt
700 1 _aBaetens, Freya,
_eeditor.
830 0 _aStudies on international courts and tribunals.
942 _2lcc
_cBOOK
999 _c6167
_d6167