000			02971cam a2200433 i 4500
999			_c5898 _d5898
001			ocn880374842
003			OCoLC
005			20200901172653.0
008			140516s2015 enka b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2014019304
015			_aGBB4E9712 _2bnb
016	7		_a016983375 _2Uk
020			_a9780199399048 _q(pbk.)
020			_a0199399042 _q(pbk.)
029	1		_aNLGGC _b391863452
035			_a(OCoLC)880374842
037			_bOxford Univ Pr, 2001 Evans rd, Cary, NC, USA, 27513 _nSAN 202-5892
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cTZ-ArACH
042			_apcc
043			_an-us---
049			_aTZAA
050	0	0	_aKF8748 _b.S82 2015
100	1		_aStaszak, Sarah L., _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aNo day in court : _baccess to justice and the politics of judicial retrenchment / _cSarah Staszak.
246	3	0	_aPolitics of judicial retrenchment
260			_aOxford [UK] ; _aNew York, NY : _bOxford University Press, _c2015.
300			_ax, 299 pages : _billustrations ; _c25 cm.
490	1		_aStudies in postwar American political development
500			_aRevision of author's disseration (doctoral - Brandeis University, 2010), issued under title: The politics of judicial retrenchment.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction -- The politics of judicial retrenchment -- Changing the decisionmakers: from litigation to arbitration -- Changing the rules: the battle to control civil procedure -- Changing the venue: the quasi-judicial realm of the administrative state -- Changing the incentives: leaving rights and removing remedies -- Conclusion.
520			_a"Since the rights revolution of the 1960s, the majority of the laws expanding access to justice have remained on the books. Today, though, less than two percent of civil cases are decided by trials. No Day in Court examines how political and legal actors at all levels have scaled back access to the courts in recent times. Although the conventional narrative of backlash focuses on a conservative Supreme Court and Congress, the effort is far more broadly based. At every level of government, officials and activists have worked to restrict access to the courts for rights claims by targeting the institutional and legal procedures that govern what constitutes a valid legal case, who can be sued, how a case is adjudicated, and what remedies are available. As Sarah Staszak shows in this powerful account, these strategies have had a profoundly negative impact on access to justice in the United States today"--Unedited summary from book cover.
650		0	_aPolitical questions and judicial power _zUnited States.
650		7	_aPolitical questions and judicial power. _2fast
651		7	_aUnited States. _2fast
830		0	_aOxford studies in postwar American political development.
856	4	1	_zFull-text _uhttps://opac.eui.eu/client/en_GB/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:390834/one
942			_2lcc _cBOOK