000			02069cam a22004214a 4500
999			_c5437 _d5437
001			ocn231580887
003			TZ-ArACH
005			20200902140355.0
008			080731s2008 enka b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2008034103
015			_aGBA8B1799 _2bnb
016	7		_a014760238 _2Uk
020			_a9780521509701 _q(hardback)
020			_a052150970X _q(hardback)
035			_a(OCoLC)231580887
040			_aDLC _beng _cTZ-ArACH
043			_ae-uk---
049			_aTZAA
050	0	0	_aKD7521 _b.D89 2008
100	1		_aDwyer, Déirdre M. _q(Déirdre Marie), _d1964-
245	1	4	_aJudicial assessment of expert evidence / _c Déirdre Dwyer.
260			_aCambridge, UK ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2008.
300			_axxxii, 435 pages : _billustrations ; _c24 cm
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 388-412) and index.
505	0		_aGeneral epistemological issues -- Expert evidence as a special case for judicial assessment -- Making sense of expert disagreement -- Non-epistemological factors in determining the role of the expert -- Assessing expert evidence in the English civil courts : the sixteenth to twentieth centuries -- Assessing expert evidence in the English civil courts today -- The effective management of bias.
520			_aBy reintegrating contemporary evidence theory with applied philosophy, Deirdre Dwyer analyses the epistemological basis for the judicial assessment of expert evidence. She also examines how we might arrange our legal processes in order to support our epistemological and non-epistemological expectations.
650		0	_aEvidence, Expert _zGreat Britain.
650		7	_aPreuves. _2eclas
650		7	_aProcédure judiciaire. _2eclas
650		7	_aLitiges. _2eclas
650		7	_aEvaluation. _2eclas
650		7	_aAnalyse comparative. _2eclas _916030
650		7	_aPays occidentaux. _2eclas
650		7	_aEvidence, Expert. _2fast
651		7	_aGreat Britain. _2fast
856	4	1	_3Table of contents _uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0825/2008034103.html
942			_2lcc _cBOOK