000			03910cam a2200553 i 4500
999			_c4086 _d4086
001			ocn779264949
003			OCoLC
005			20171106164744.0
008			120305s2012 enk b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2012008280
016	7		_a016044561 _2Uk
020			_a9781107017078 _q(hardback)
020			_a1107017076 _q(hardback)
029	1		_aAU@ _b000048712294
029	1		_aCHSLU _b001052599
029	1		_aCHVBK _b030774705
029	1		_aNZ1 _b14317215
029	1		_aZWZ _b190700505
035			_a(OCoLC)779264949
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dYDX _dBTCTA _dUKMGB _dYDXCP _dBWK _dYNK _dCDX _dBWX _dOCLCO _dCLU _dIUL _dPUL _dCGU _dCOO _dJ2H _dWLL _dOCLCQ _dBEDGE _dOCLCQ _dCHVBK _dOCLCQ _dUX0 _dLRP _dOCLCO
042			_apcc
049			_aTZAA
050	0	0	_aKZ6376 _b.L37 2012
082	0	0	_a341.5/84 _223
084			_aPOL035010 _2bisacsh
084			_aKC1281 _b.L37 _2moys
100	1		_aLarsen, Kjetil Mujewzinović _d1976-
245	1	4	_aHuman rights treaty obligations of peacekeepers / _cKjetil Mujewzinović Larsen.
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press _c2012
300			_axlii, 473 pages ; _c24 cm.
490	1		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v93
500			_aRevision of the author's thesis (Ph. D., University of Oslo, 2010).
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 439-460) and index.
505	0		_aPart I. Background and context -- 1. Introduction and overview -- 2. The context -- Part II. Two fundamental arguments for non-applicability of human rights treaties -- 3. The argument of non-applicability ratione personae -- 4. The argument of non-applicability ratione loci -- Part III. Circumstances that may exclude or modify the application of the treaties -- 5. The applicability of human rights law during armed conflicts -- 6. Derogations -- 7. Norm conflicts between UN Security Council mandates and human rights treaties -- Part IV. Application in concretu : the right to life, to freedom from torture, and to liberty and security -- 8. Legal challenges relating to the interrelationship between troop contributing states -- 9. Selected issues relating to the application of substantive provisions -- Part V. Conclusions -- 10. Conclusions.
520			_a"Do States, through their military forces, have legal obligations under human rights treaties towards the local civilian population during UN-mandated peace operations? It is frequently claimed that it is unrealistic to require compliance with human rights treaties in peace operations and this has led to an unwillingness to hold States accountable for human rights violations. In this book, Kjetil Larsen criticises this position by addressing the arguments against the applicability of human rights treaties and demonstrating that compliance with the treaties is unrealistic only if one takes an 'all or nothing' approach to them. He outlines a coherent and more flexible approach which distinguishes clearly between positive and negative obligations and makes treaty compliance more realistic. His proposals for the application of human rights treaties would also strengthen the legal framework for human rights protection in peace operations without posing any unrealistic obligations on the military forces"--
610	2	0	_aUnited Nations _xPeacekeeping forces.
650		0	_aHuman rights monitoring.
650		0	_aTreaties.
650		0	_aPeacekeeping forces _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aConflict management.
650		7	_aPolitical science _xPolitical Freedom & Security _xHuman Rights. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aDroit international. _2eclas
650		7	_aDroits de l'homme. _2eclas
650		7	_aGuerres. _2eclas
650		7	_aMaintien de la paix. _2eclas
650		7	_aSécurité internationale. _2eclas
830		0	_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ; _v93. _9706
942			_2lcc _cBOOK