000			03201cam a22003733i 4500
999			_c3920 _d3920
001			ocn872220463
003			TZ-ArACH
005			20200910133041.0
008			140310r20142012enk b 001 0 eng d
020			_a9781107416949 _q(paperback)
020			_a1107416949 _q(paperback)
035			_a(OCoLC)872220463
040			_aYDXCP _beng _erda _cTZ-ArACH
049			_aTZAA
050			_aKZ6376 _b.L37
100	1		_aLarsen, Kjetil Mujezinović, _d1976- _eauthor.
245	1	4	_aHuman rights treaty obligations of peacekeepers / _cKjetil Mujezinović Larsen.
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2012
300			_axlii, 473 pages ; _c23 cm.
490	1		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v[93]
500			_aOriginally published in 2012.
500			_a"Table of cases": pages xxiii-xl.
500			_aRevision of the author's thesis (Ph. D., University of Oslo, 2010).
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 439-460) and index.
505	0		_aPart I. Background and context -- 1. Introduction and overview -- 2. The context -- Part II. Two fundamental arguments for non-applicability of human rights treaties -- 3. The argument of non-applicability ratione personae -- 4. The argument of non-applicability ratione loci -- Part III. Circumstances that may exclude or modify the application of the treaties -- 5. The applicability of human rights law during armed conflicts -- 6. Derogations -- 7. Norm conflicts between UN Security Council mandates and human rights treaties -- Part IV. Application in concretu : the right to life, to freedom from torture, and to liberty and security -- 8. Legal challenges relating to the interrelationship between troop contributing states -- 9. Selected issues relating to the application of substantive provisions -- Part V. Conclusions.
520			_a"Do States, through their military forces, have legal obligations under human rights treaties towards the local civilian population during UN-mandated peace operations? It is frequently claimed that it is unrealistic to require compliance with human rights treaties in peace operations and this has led to an unwillingness to hold States accountable for human rights violations. In this book, Kjetil Larsen criticises this position by addressing the arguments against the applicability of human rights treaties and demonstrating that compliance with the treaties is unrealistic only if one takes an 'all or nothing' approach to them. He outlines a coherent and more flexible approach which distinguishes clearly between positive and negative obligations and makes treaty compliance more realistic. His proposals for the application of human rights treaties would also strengthen the legal framework for human rights protection in peace operations without posing any unrealistic obligations on the military forces"--
610	2	0	_aUnited Nations _xPeacekeeping forces.
650		0	_aHuman rights monitoring.
650		0	_aTreaties.
650		0	_aPeacekeeping forces _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aConflict management.
830		0	_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v93. _94902
942			_2lcc _cBOOK