000 03755cam a2200625 i 4500
999 _c3789
_d3789
001 ocn824180320
003 OCoLC
005 20200214133742.0
008 130603s2013 enk b 001 0 eng
010 _a 2013371098
015 _aGBB301516
_2bnb
016 7 _a016246315
_2Uk
020 _a9780199671151
_q(cloth)
020 _a019967115X
_q(cloth)
020 _a9780198743729
020 _a0198743726
029 1 _aAU@
_b000051047965
029 1 _aNLGGC
_b374310335
029 1 _aNZ1
_b14925460
035 _a(OCoLC)824180320
_z(OCoLC)819383038
_z(OCoLC)852707408
_z(OCoLC)856578010
040 _aDLC
_beng
_erda
_cTZ-ArACH
042 _apcc
049 _aTZAA
050 0 0 _aKZ7230
_b.W43
082 0 4 _a341
_223
100 1 _aWebb, Philippa
_q(Philippa Mahal),
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aInternational judicial integration and fragmentation /
_cPhilippa Webb.
250 _aFirst edition.
260 _aOxford (UK)
_bOxford University Press
_c2013
300 _axxv, 253 pages ;
_c24 cm.
490 1 _aInternational courts and tribunals series
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 229-248) and index.
505 0 0 _gIntroduction --
_tGenocide --
_tImmunities --
_tUse of force --
_tExplaining judicial integration and fragmentation --
_gConclusion.
520 _a"Fragmentation is one of the major debates within international law, but few detailed case studies have been made to show the problems that it creates, and how they can be addressed. This book asks whether the growing number of international judicial bodies render decisions that are largely consistent with one another, which factors influence this (in)consistency, and what this tells us about the development of international law by international courts and tribunals. It answers these questions by focusing on three areas of law - genocide, immunities, and the use of force - as in each of these areas different international judicial entities have dealt with cases stemming from similar situations and set of facts. The work focuses on four main courts: the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, which often interpret, apply, and develop the same legal principles, despite their different mandates and functions. It argues that coherent and compatible (but not necessarily uniform) pronouncements on the law by international courts are vital to retaining the confidence of the international community. Ultimately, the book makes a plea for the importance of coherence in international law and proposes a model for enhancing judicial integration"--Unedited summary from book jacket.
650 0 _aInternational criminal courts.
650 0 _aInternational crimes.
650 0 _aIntervention (International law)
650 0 _aAggression (International law)
650 0 _aGenocide (International law)
650 0 _aPrivileges and immunities.
_93810
650 7 _aJuridictions internationales.
_2eclas
650 7 _aCIJ = Cour internationale de justice.
_2eclas
_914845
650 7 _aCour pénale internationale.
_2eclas
_917484
650 7 _aTribunaux pénaux internationaux.
_2eclas
650 7 _aAggression (International law)
_2fast
650 7 _aGenocide (International law)
_2fast
650 7 _aInternational crimes.
_2fast
650 7 _aInternational criminal courts.
_2fast
650 7 _aIntervention (International law)
_2fast
650 7 _aPrivileges and immunities.
_2fast
_93810
655 7 _aRules.
_2fast
830 0 _aInternational courts and tribunals series.
856 4 1 _3Table of contents
_uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy14pdf03/2013371098.html
942 _2lcc
_cBOOK