000			03467cam a2200481 a 4500
001			ocn670484639
003			TZ-ArACH
005			20230918123043.0
008			101104s2011 enka b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2010045606
016	7		_a015722926 _2Uk
020			_a9781107684294 _q(paperback)
020			_a1107684293 _q(paperback)
035			_a(OCoLC)670484639
040			_aDLC _beng _cTZ-ArACH
042			_apcc
049			_aTZAA
050	0	0	_aK4448 _b.W35
100	1		_aWaibel, Michael, _cLL. M. _916872
245	1	0	_aSovereign defaults before International courts and tribunals / _cMichael Waibel.
260			_aCambridge ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2011.
300			_alvi, 366 pages : _billustrations ; _c24 cm.
490	1		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v81
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 330-349) and index.
505	0		_aSovereign debt crises and defaults -- Political responses to sovereign defaults -- Quasi-receivership of highly indebted countries -- Monetary reform and sovereign debt -- Financial necessity -- National settlement institutions -- Arbitration on sovereign debt -- Arbitration clauses in sovereign debt instruments -- Creditor protection in international law -- ICSID arbitration on sovereign debt -- Overlapping jurisdiction over sovereign debt -- Sovereign default as trigger of responsibility -- Compensation on sovereign debt -- Building durable institutions for adjudicating sovereign defaults.
520			_a"International law on sovereign defaults is underdeveloped because States have largely refrained from adjudicating disputes arising out of public debt. The looming new wave of sovereign defaults is likely to shift dispute resolution away from national courts to international tribunals and transform the current regime for restructuring sovereign debt. Michael Waibel assesses how international tribunals balance creditor claims and sovereign capacity to pay across time. The history of adjudicating sovereign defaults internationally over the last 150 years offers a rich repository of experience for future cases: US state defaults, quasi-receiverships in the Dominican Republic and Ottoman Empire, the Venezuela Preferential Case, the Soviet repudiation in 1917, the League of Nations, the World War Foreign Debt Commission, Germany's 30-year restructuring after 1918 and ICSID arbitration on Argentina's default in 2001. The remarkable continuity in international practice and jurisprudence suggests avenues for building durable institutions capable of resolving future sovereign defaults"--Provided by publisher.
650		0	_aDebts, Public _xLaw and legislation.
650		0	_aDebts, External _xLaw and legislation.
650		0	_aArbitration (International law)
650		0	_aInternational courts.
650		7	_aLaw _xInternational. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aDette publique. _2eclas _916878
650		7	_aDette extérieure. _2eclas
650		7	_aDroit international. _2eclas
650		7	_aArbitrage international. _2eclas
650		7	_aJuridictions internationales. _2eclas
650		7	_aArbitration (International law) _2fast
650		7	_aDebts, External _xLaw and legislation. _2fast
650		7	_aDebts, Public _xLaw and legislation. _2fast
650		7	_aInternational courts. _2fast
830		0	_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ; _v81. _9706
942			_2lcc _cBOOK
999			_c3765 _d3765