000			03026cam a2200445 i 4500
999			_c3473 _d3473
001			ocn922913077
003			OCoLC
005			20170829101953.0
008			151005t20162016enk b 001 0 eng c
020			_a9781107029453
020			_a1107029457
029	1		_aNLGGC _b40085550X
035			_a(OCoLC)922913077 _z(OCoLC)920816413
040			_aBTCTA _beng _erda _cBTCTA _dYDXCP _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dCOO _dCDX _dOCLCF _dGUL _dOCL _dNLGGC _dNYP _dOCL _dUCL _dZLM _dOCLCA
042			_apcc
043			_af-sa---
049			_aTZAA
050		4	_aKTL2460 _b.R39 2016
082	0	4	_a342.68085 _223
100	1		_aRay, Brian E. _q(Brian Edward), _eauthor.
245	0	0	_aEngaging with social rights : _bprocedure, participation, and democracy in South Africa's second wave / _cBrian Ray.
300			_axi, 381 pages ; _c24 cm.
490	1		_aComparative constitutional law and policy
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Part I. Justiciability and the First Wave. The justiciability debate and the 1996 constitution -- The first wave cases -- A 'curious divergence' -- Part II. Procedure and the Second Wave. The second-wave cases -- The eviction cases -- Patterns and possibilities in the second wave -- Part III. Procedure's Potential. The eviction model -- Democratic engagement -- Conclusion: real rights.
520			_a"With a new and comprehensive account of the South African Constitutional Court's social rights decisions, Brian Ray argues that the Court's procedural enforcement approach has had significant but underappreciated effects on law and policy and challenges the view that a stronger substantive standard of review is necessary to realize these rights. Drawing connections between the Court's widely acclaimed early decisions and the more recent second-wave cases, Ray explains that the Court has responded to the democratic legitimacy and institutional competence concerns that consistently constrain it by developing doctrines and remedial techniques that enable activists, civil society and local communities to press directly for rights-protective policies through structured, court-managed engagement processes. Engaging with Social Rights shows how those tools could be developed to make state institutions responsive to the needs of poor communities by giving those communities and their advocates consistent access to policy-making and planning processes." -- Publisher's description
600			_2on order
610	1	0	_aSouth Africa. _bConstitutional Court. _9909
610	1	7	_aSouth Africa. _bConstitutional Court. _2fast _9909
610	2	4	_aSouth Africa. _bConstitutional Court. _9909
650		0	_aSocial rights _zSouth Africa.
650		0	_aConstitutional law _zSouth Africa.
650		0	_aDemocracy _zSouth Africa.
650		7	_aDemocracy. _2fast _911142
650		7	_aConstitutional law. _2fast
650		7	_aSocial rights. _2fast
651		7	_aSouth Africa. _2fast
830		0	_aComparative constitutional law and policy.
942			_2lcc _cBOOK