000			04040cam a2200433Ii 4500
999			_c3273 _d3273
001			ocn864139742
003			TZ-ArACH
005			20190322101246.0
006			m o d
007			cr cnu---unuuu
008			131126s2014 nyua ob 001 0 eng d
020			_z9780199844135
020			_z0199844135
035			_a(OCoLC)864139742 _z(OCoLC)864383590
040			_aN$T _beng _erda _epn _cTZ-ArACH
041			_aEng
049			_aTZAA
050		4	_aKZ7312 _b.B67
082	0	4	_a345/.01 _223
100	1		_aBosco, David L., _eauthor. _918774
245	1	0	_aRough justice : the International Criminal Court in a world of power politics _bthe International Criminal Court in a world of power politics / _cDavid Bosco.
260			_aOxford ; _aNew York, NY : _bOxford University Press, _c2014.
300			_ax, 297 pages _billustrations
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 247-285) and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: -- Introduction -- 1. A Framework for Analysis -- 2. Origins -- 3. The Phantom Court (1998-2002) -- 4. Caution and Consensus (July 2002-March 2005) -- 5. Breakthrough (2005-2008) -- 6. Power Plays (2008-2012) -- Conclusion: A Constrained Court.
520			_a"Ten years ago, in the wake of massive crimes in central Africa and the Balkans, the first permanent international criminal court was established in The Hague despite resistance from some of the world's most powerful states. In the past decade, the court has grown from a few staff in an empty building to a bustling institution with more than a thousand lawyers, investigators, and administrators from around the world. Despite its growth and the backing of more than 120 nations, the ICC is still struggling to assert itself in often turbulent political crises. The ICC is generally autonomous in its ability to select cases and investigate crimes, but it is ultimately dependent on sovereign states, and particularly on the world's leading powers. These states can provide the diplomatic, economic, and military clout the court often needs to get cooperation-and to arrest suspects. But states don't expend precious political capital lightly, and the court has often struggled to get the help it needs. When their interests are most affected, moreover, powerful states usually want the court to keep its distance. Directly and indirectly, they make their preferences known in The Hague. Rough Justice grapples with the court's basic dilemma: designed to be apolitical, it requires the support of politicians who pursue national interests and answer to domestic audiences. Through a sharp analysis of the dynamics at work behind the scenes, Bosco assesses the ways in which powerful states have shaped the court's effort to transform the vision of international justice into reality. This will be the definitive account of the Court and its uneven progress toward advancing accountability around the world"--
520			_a"In Rough Justice, David Bosco tells the story of the movement to establish the International Criminal Court and its tumultuous first decade. He also considers its prospects for the future, especially the very real challenges that it faces. He has access to many of the court's principals, and this will be an authoritative account of an international institution that is prototypical of the post-Cold War era"--
610	2	0	_aInternational Criminal Court. _918775
610	2	4	_aInternational Criminal Court. _918776
610	2	7	_aInternational Criminal Court. _2fast _918777
650		0	_aInternational criminal courts _xHistory. _918778
650		7	_aInternational criminal courts. _2fast _918779
650		7	_aICC _918780
655		7	_aHistory. _2fast _918781
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aBosco, David L., author. _tRough justice _z9780199844135 _w(DLC) 2013028219 _w(OCoLC)855779216
856	4	0	_3ebrary _uhttp://site.ebrary.com/id/10806867
856	4	0	_3EBSCOhost _uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=666792
942			_2lcc _cBOOK