000			03604cam a2200505 a 4500
999			_c3120 _d3120
001			ocn670484639
003			TZ-ArACH
005			20190320151713.0
008			101104s2011 enka b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2010045606
016	7		_a015722926 _2Uk
020			_a9780521196994 (hardback)
020			_a052119699X (hardback)
035			_a(OCoLC)670484639
040			_aDLC _beng _cTZ-ArACH
041			_aEng
042			_apcc
049			_aTZAA
050	0	0	_aK4448 _b.W35
082	0	0	_a343/.037 _222
100	1		_aWaibel, Michael, _cLL. M. _916872
245	1	0	_aSovereign defaults before International courts and tribunals / _cMichael Waibel.
260			_aCambridge ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2011.
300			_alvi, 366 pages : _billustrations ; _c24 cm.
490	1		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v81
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 330-349) and index.
505	0		_aSovereign debt crises and defaults -- Political responses to sovereign defaults -- Quasi-receivership of highly indebted countries -- Monetary reform and sovereign debt -- Financial necessity -- National settlement institutions -- Arbitration on sovereign debt -- Arbitration clauses in sovereign debt instruments -- Creditor protection in international law -- ICSID arbitration on sovereign debt -- Overlapping jurisdiction over sovereign debt -- Sovereign default as trigger of responsibility -- Compensation on sovereign debt -- Building durable institutions for adjudicating sovereign defaults.
520			_a"International law on sovereign defaults is underdeveloped because States have largely refrained from adjudicating disputes arising out of public debt. The looming new wave of sovereign defaults is likely to shift dispute resolution away from national courts to international tribunals and transform the current regime for restructuring sovereign debt. Michael Waibel assesses how international tribunals balance creditor claims and sovereign capacity to pay across time. The history of adjudicating sovereign defaults internationally over the last 150 years offers a rich repository of experience for future cases: US state defaults, quasi-receiverships in the Dominican Republic and Ottoman Empire, the Venezuela Preferential Case, the Soviet repudiation in 1917, the League of Nations, the World War Foreign Debt Commission, Germany's 30-year restructuring after 1918 and ICSID arbitration on Argentina's default in 2001. The remarkable continuity in international practice and jurisprudence suggests avenues for building durable institutions capable of resolving future sovereign defaults"--Provided by publisher.
650		0	_aDebts, Public _xLaw and legislation. _916873
650		0	_aDebts, External _xLaw and legislation. _916874
650		0	_aArbitration (International law) _916875
650		0	_aInternational courts. _916876
650		7	_aLAW _xInternational. _2bisacsh _916877
650		7	_aDette publique. _2eclas _916878
650		7	_aDette extérieure. _2eclas _916879
650		7	_aDroit international. _2eclas _916880
650		7	_aArbitrage international. _2eclas _916881
650		7	_aJuridictions internationales. _2eclas _916882
650		7	_aArbitration (International law) _2fast _916883
650		7	_aDebts, External _xLaw and legislation. _2fast _916884
650		7	_aDebts, Public _xLaw and legislation. _2fast _916885
650		7	_aInternational courts. _2fast _916886
830		0	_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ; _v81. _916887
942			_2lcc _cBOOK