TY  - BOOK
AU  - Baldinger,Dana
TI  - Vertical judicial dialogues in asylum cases: standards on judicial scrutiny and evidence in international and European asylum law 
T2  - Immigration and asylum law and policy in Europe,
SN  - 9789004290716
AV  - KJE5202 .B35 2015
U1  - 342.08/3 23
PY  - 2015///
CY  - Leiden ; , Boston : 
PB  - Brill Nijhoff
KW  - Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees
KW  - (1951 July 28)
KW  - Protocols, etc
KW  - (1967 January 31)
KW  - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
KW  - (1966 December 16)
KW  - Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
KW  - (1984 December 10)
KW  - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
KW  - (1950 November 5)
KW  - fast
KW  - Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (1951 July 28)
KW  - Asylum, Right of
KW  - European Union countries
KW  - Emigration and immigration law
N1  - Includes bibliographical references (pages 503-521) and index; Introduction -- The 1951 convention relating to the status of refugees (RC) and the protocol (RP) relating to the status of refugees -- The 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) -- The 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) -- The 1950 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) -- European Union Asylum Law -- National courts and the independent and rigorous scrutiny -- Repeat cases, Dublin cases, fast-track national proceedings
N2  - What do international and EU law require from the national asylum judge with regard to the intensity of judicial scrutiny to be applied and evidentiary issues? To answer that question, an analysis is made of the provisions on national judicial proceedings contained in the Refugee Convention (RC), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the UN Convention against Torture (CAT), the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. In addition, the assessment as performed by the UN Human Rights Committee, the UN Committee against Torture and the European Court of Human Rights in cases concerning the expulsion of asylum seekers is analysed.--
ER  -