Comparative reasoning in international courts and tribunals / Daniel Peat, Leiden University.
Material type:
TextSeries: Cambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ; 145.Publisher: Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2019Description: xxv, 258 pages ; 24 cmContent type: - text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9781108415477
- 1108415474
- 9781108401470
- 1108401473
- International courts -- Rules and practice
- Law -- Methodology
- International and municipal law
- Comparative law
- Tribunaux internationaux -- R�eglements et proc�edure
- Droit international et droit interne
- Droit compar�e
- Law -- Methodology
- Comparative law
- International and municipal law
- International courts
- Auslegung
- Innerstaatliches Recht
- Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit
- Rechtsanwendung
- V�olkerrecht
- Tribunals internacionals -- Reglaments i procediments
- Dret internacional i dret intern
- Dret comparat
- Dret -- Metodologia
- International courts
- International law and national law
- Interpretation
- Comparative law
- 341.5/5 23
- KZ6269 .P43 2019
- KZ6250 .P43 2019
- 86.83
Includes bibliographical references (page 222-248) and index.
The limits of the Vienna Convention -- Domestic law in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice -- The interpretation of schedules of commitments in the WTO -- International investment law and the public law analogy -- Consensus doctrine in the European Court of Human Rights -- Domestic law and system building in the ICTY.
"Domestic law has long been recognised as a source of international law, an inspiration for legal developments, or the benchmark against which a legal system is to be assessed. Academic commentary normally re-traces these well-trodden paths, leaving one with the impression that the interaction between domestic and international law is unworthy of further enquiry. However, a different - and surprisingly pervasive - nexus between the two spheres has been largely overlooked: the use of domestic law in the interpretation of international law. This book examines the practice of five international courts and tribunals to demonstrate that domestic law is invoked to interpret international law, often outside the framework of Articles 31 to 33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. It assesses the appropriateness of such recourse to domestic law as well as situating the practice within broader debates regarding interpretation and the interaction between domestic and international legal systems."-- Back cover.
There are no comments on this title.
