Evaluating scientific evidence :
Beecher-Monas, Erica, 1949-2017.
Evaluating scientific evidence : an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process / Erica Beecher-Monas. - Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007. - xi, 254 pages ; 24 cm. - The law in context series . - Law in context. .
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Triers of science -- Intellectual due process -- A framework of analysis -- Toxic torts and the causation conundrum -- Criminal identification evidence -- Future dangerousness testimony : the epistemology of prediction -- Barefoot or Daubert? : a cognitive perspective on vetting future -- Dangerousness testimony -- Future dangerousness and sexual offenders -- Models of rationality : evaluating social psychology -- Evaluating battered woman syndrome.
"Scientific evidence is crucial in a burgeoning number of litigated cases, legislative enactments, regulatory decisions, and scholarly arguments. Evaluating Scientific Evidence explores the question of what counts as scientific knowledge, a question that has become a focus of heated courtroom and scholarly debate, not only in the United States, but also in other common law countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia."--Jacket.
9780521676557
2006017094
GBA683693 bnb
Evidence, Expert--United States.
Forensic sciences--United States.
Evidence, Expert.
Forensic sciences.
Preuves.
Expertises judiciaires.
M�edecine.
Droit p�enal.
Evaluation.
Pays occidentaux.
Recherche interdisciplinaire.
Evidence, Expert.
Forensic sciences.
Beweisf�uhrung.
Beweismittel.
Strafverfahrensrecht.
United States.
USA.
KF8961 / .B44
347.73/67
Evaluating scientific evidence : an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process / Erica Beecher-Monas. - Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007. - xi, 254 pages ; 24 cm. - The law in context series . - Law in context. .
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Triers of science -- Intellectual due process -- A framework of analysis -- Toxic torts and the causation conundrum -- Criminal identification evidence -- Future dangerousness testimony : the epistemology of prediction -- Barefoot or Daubert? : a cognitive perspective on vetting future -- Dangerousness testimony -- Future dangerousness and sexual offenders -- Models of rationality : evaluating social psychology -- Evaluating battered woman syndrome.
"Scientific evidence is crucial in a burgeoning number of litigated cases, legislative enactments, regulatory decisions, and scholarly arguments. Evaluating Scientific Evidence explores the question of what counts as scientific knowledge, a question that has become a focus of heated courtroom and scholarly debate, not only in the United States, but also in other common law countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia."--Jacket.
9780521676557
2006017094
GBA683693 bnb
Evidence, Expert--United States.
Forensic sciences--United States.
Evidence, Expert.
Forensic sciences.
Preuves.
Expertises judiciaires.
M�edecine.
Droit p�enal.
Evaluation.
Pays occidentaux.
Recherche interdisciplinaire.
Evidence, Expert.
Forensic sciences.
Beweisf�uhrung.
Beweismittel.
Strafverfahrensrecht.
United States.
USA.
KF8961 / .B44
347.73/67